NASA Urged to Increase Funding for Biological and Physical Sciences Research in Space
In a new decadal survey titled “Thriving in Space,” experts have recommended a tenfold increase in NASA’s spending on biological and physical sciences research in space. The survey argues that the funding boost is essential for addressing ambitious science questions in low Earth orbit and beyond.
Currently, NASA’s budget for biological and physical sciences research is set at $85 million for fiscal year 2023. However, the agency had initially requested $100 million for the division. The survey report highlights that this amount is significantly inadequate compared to both previous funding levels and the recommendations from the previous decadal survey conducted in 2011.
The report singles out 11 key science questions that need to be addressed in order to adapt to space conditions. These questions encompass various aspects, including adapting to space, living and traveling in space, and exploring phenomena that are hidden by gravity or terrestrial limitations.
Furthermore, the report suggests two specific research campaigns. One campaign emphasizes the development of long-duration spaceflight capabilities, while the other focuses on manufacturing techniques that can be utilized in space, reducing waste and optimizing resources.
A significant concern raised by the survey report is the potential oversight of biological and physical sciences research caused by the upcoming transition from the International Space Station to commercial space stations. The report warns that without adequate attention to these research areas, valuable scientific discoveries could be missed.
NASA is expected to thoroughly review the report and consider its recommendations. The agency plans to release a formal public response and host a town hall early next year to discuss the report’s findings and potential plans.
The new decadal survey for biological and physical sciences research in space highlights the need for increased funding to address critical science questions and further advancements in space exploration. With NASA’s response eagerly awaited, it remains to be seen how the agency will address these recommendations and their potential impact on future space research and development initiatives.
“Prone to fits of apathy. Devoted music geek. Troublemaker. Typical analyst. Alcohol practitioner. Food junkie. Passionate tv fan. Web expert.”